Which specification governs this dig
Gas, electricity and water asset owners each publish their own plant-protection specification, and the clause that applies depends on which network you are near.
Contact us →A buyer checking a technique against a gas asset, pricing a day of suction excavation, or working out who pays after a strike is not looking for a summary. They need the clause, the paragraph number and the edition date, because that is what goes into a scope of works or gets read out on a call with a contractor who disagrees.
Nine questions like these recur across this kind of work, and each one has its own page here, built the same way. The governing document is named first, with its reference and edition, then the clause or paragraph itself, then what it changes about the decision in front of the reader.
Some of these questions sit under a document that binds the job, such as an asset owner's plant-protection specification. Others sit under guidance that is not compulsory, such as HSE's HSG47, or under an industry code such as CPA's SAVESIG guidance, and the difference between the two matters when a contractor pushes back on a requirement. Each page states which kind of document it is dealing with before it says what that document requires.
Hydro Excavators is an independent UK publisher. It does not sell, hire or operate excavation equipment, so the pages follow the order a buyer or specifier actually needs the answers in, not a service list.
Before a scope of works can be written, these are the points a contractor will be held to.
Gas, electricity and water asset owners each publish their own plant-protection specification, and the clause that applies depends on which network you are near.
Contact us →HSE HSG47 (3rd edition, 2014) is guidance, not law, and its paragraphs sit alongside whichever asset owner specification actually binds the job.
Contact us →No independent rate book exists for this work, so every published figure needs to be attributed to the company that published it.
Contact us →Suction, air-lance and water-lance excavation suit different ground conditions and asset types, and the wrong choice risks the asset or the spoil.
Contact us →Excavated arisings carry a waste classification and a disposal route that depend on the asset, the technique and the reinstatement class required.
Contact us →Liability, operator competence, scope-of-works wording and survey level each turn on a different document, cited with its clause.
Liability falls under NRSWA 1991 section 82 and separately under ordinary negligence, with the two duties handled differently on site.
Check the position →The competence duty sits in HSWA 1974 section 2. CPCS A78 and NPORS N021 are the cards the industry uses as proxies for it.
Verify the requirement →Clause-level wording for technique, nozzle, operator card level, banksman and spoil route, marked as a starting point for review against the asset owner's specification.
See the wording →PAS 128:2022 sets out quality levels built from the survey method used to reach each one, current since the 2022 edition.
Check the level →A cost figure for this kind of work rarely arrives with its source attached, and that is the difficulty a buyer runs into first: a number is repeated across search results and quotes with nobody saying who counted it or why.
A supplier figure tells you what one company charges. Pricing a scope of works against it alone means anchoring on a single seller's rate card. A figure with no independent source is not wrong for that reason alone, but it is not usable on its own either: what matters at that point is the drivers behind the price, not the price itself, because there is nothing to check the number against.
Wherever a figure is quoted here, its class travels with it, so a buyer taking a number to a contractor knows straight away whether they are holding a market rate, a statutory fee or one company's asking price.